WebPerkins v. Texas and New Orleans R. Co., 243 La. 829, 147 So.2d 646, 648 (1962). Applying the findings of fact to this legal proposition, the court below was justified in finding that the appellant's negligence was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury. WebPERKINS v. TEXAS AND NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY. SANDERS, Justice. This is a tort action. Plaintiff, the 67-year-old widow of Tanner Perkins, seeks damages for the death of her husband in the collision of an automobile, in which he was riding, with a train of the defendant railroad. The district court awarded damages.
Chapter 4 - Actual Causation Flashcards Quizlet
WebCitationPerkins v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 243 La. 829, 147 So. 2d 646, 1962 La. LEXIS 569 (La. 1962) Brief Fact Summary. The husband of the Plaintiff, Ms. Perkins (Plaintiff), was a … Citation509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469, 1993 U.S. Brief Fact … CitationKramer Service, Inc. v. Wilkins, 184 Miss. 483, 186 So. 625, 1939 Miss. LEXIS … Citation445 U.S. 920 100 S. Ct. 1284 63 L. Ed. 2d 605 1980 U.S. Brief Fact … WebMaxine PERKINS v. TEXAS AND NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY. No. 46086. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 10, 1962. Porter & Scofield, Lake Charles, for applicant. … lamberto sanfelice wikipedia
PERKINS v. TEXAS AND NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY
WebCausation in FactPerkins v. Texas and New Orleans R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana (1962)Procedure:The trial court awarded damages, the court of appeals affirmed. Facts:The widow is suing the railroad companies. Her husband was hit by a train while ridingas a guest in a truck in the front seat. WebPerkins v. Texas and New Orleans R. Co. (1962) Automobile hit by a train. Train was going 37 mph. The limit was 25 mph. Accident would have occurred regardless of train speed. It is fundamental that the negligence is not actionable unless it is a cause in fact of the harm for which recovery is sought. Negligence is a cause in fact of the harm ... WebPerkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co Brief . CitationPerkins v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 243 La. 829, 147 So. 2d 646, 1962 La. LEXIS 569 (La. 1962) Brief Fact Summary. The husband of the Plaintiff, Ms. Perkins (Plaintiff), was a passenger in a car when a train at a railway crossing struck the car. The Plaintiff’s husband was killed. jerome thug love jones